Click Here To Learn More About Safe Water Bottles
There is much debate on the internet about the safety of SIGG water bottles. Much of the debate arises from the fact that there has been little to no research on their safety compared to stainless steel and plastic water bottles. In this article I will go over the limited information available (and why it is limited) and ultimately try to answer the question: are SIGG water bottles safe?
What we know for sure about SIGG water bottles is that the exterior is made of aluminum while the interior is lined with a “water based epoxy resin.” The liner is added to prevent the aluminum from leaching into the contents of one’s water bottle since consuming aluminum is likely to be bad for your health.
This liner is what makes it very difficult to answer the question, are SIGG water bottles safe? due to many unknowns about the liner. According to SIGG’s website(SIGG has since removed this from their website) “the ingredients (like the formula for Coca-Cola) remain secret and unavailable to 3rd parties so as to ensure SIGG retains its competitive advantage. The key of course is that the SIGG liner is FDA approved and independently tested to be taste and scent inert – and resistant to any leaching (0.0%) so 100% safe.” There are three problems with these statements: 1) the last time I checked, the ingredients for Coca-Cola are right on the can; 2) the FDA has approved many plastic and canned food products that contain Bisphenol-A (BPA), a chemical which simulates estrogen and in animal studies has been shown to cause a wide range of health problems; and 3) the 0.0% leaching they are referring to is from an “independent” study in which SIGG paid Alliance Technology LLC, a for profit company, to conduct.
In this study (SIGG removed it from their site but luckily I saved it. You can view it here), the testers used an LOQ (limit of quantization) of 2 PPB (parts per billion) which basically means that they didn’t attempt to detect BPA below this level. In the scientific world, the LOQ can be considered zero. This allowed SIGG to legally (or should I say, deceptively) claim that their bottles leach no BPA.
This liner, which was the focus of the study, at one time was described as a “water based epoxy resin” by SIGG. Those words have now been removed from their website, but it continues to be displayed on product web sites such as Amazon.com. According to Wikipedia, “most common epoxy resins are produced from a reaction between epichlorohydrin and bisphenol-A.” Another interesting fact is that BPA epoxy resins were co-invented by Dr. Pierre Castan of Switzerland, the same country in which SIGG bottles are manufactured. Dr. Castan’s work was then licensed by Ciba, Ltd. of Switzerland which is now one of the three major epoxy resin producers in the world.
In summary, we have learned: 1) the liner is made of a “water based epoxy resin”; 2) most epoxy resins contain BPA; 3) BPA epoxy resins were co-invented by a Swiss scientist; 4) one of the three largest manufacturers of epoxy resins is a Swiss company; 5) SIGG bottles are manufactured in Switzerland; 6) SIGG paid a for-profit lab to do an “independent” study where not all levels of BPA were tested; 7) SIGG has deceptively used this study to claim their bottles do not leach any BPA; and lastly 8) at one time they described the liner as a “water based epoxy resin” on their website, but it has since been removed. At this point you may still be asking yourself, are SIGG water bottles safe? The reality is that there isn’t enough information to say for sure. Until SIGG releases more information, you are going to have to use your best judgment to decide if you want to believe what SIGG is marketing and take the risk of your water bottle leaching a dangerous chemical such as BPA. In my opinion, I would rather go with a stainless steel water bottle, such as Klean Kanteen, which has been proven to be safe and doesn’t leach any chemicals.
Click Here To Learn More About Safe Water Bottles
Hi There,
This is all very interesting, but add to that the fact that Sigg has been making water bottles for more than 100 years now. Wouldn’t we know by now if these bottles were having adverse effects on people? Just a thought.
Also, in your comment you mentioned that “1) the last time I checked, the ingredients for Coca-Cola are right on the can.” There is a difference between listing the ingredients and stating the formula (or recipe). It is quite possible to know the ingredients without knowing precisely how the drink was created.
Honestly, I have no vested interest in Sigg one way or the other. I own a few of their bottles in addition to others. I just thought I’d bring this up. Thanks for your time.
Jayney,
Thanks for stopping by. You make some excellent points.
Joe
I’ve used a number of different ‘containers’ for transporting water over the past 30 years and personally I think some of this stuff is a little too simplistic.
I’ve used Sigg water bottles, Brita water bottles with replacable filter, stainless steel thermoses from Thermos, Nissan and a couple unknown companies, and insulated water bottles from Imusa SA.
Lets be realistic – all this stuff looks good on paper. I’ve experienced corrosion issues with the most recent onslought of stainless steel items from China – particularly in areas where seams might have been welded and then ground down.
And sanitation is critical with all or any of these. Mildew and bacteria will build up in any container that isn’t properly washed and dried on a daily basis. In SS products that silicon seal is still subject to mildew.
So when it comes to health and safety – proper sanitation is a LOT more important than material.
And not all SS is created equal either. Its how homogeneous any alloy mix is, not just the overall proportions – that determines how effective it is against corrosion.
When it comes to my health – I don’t have a lot of confidence in products coming out of countries that have poorly regulated health standards. Glazed products and SS products are regulated differently in North America than they are in most third world countries.
Burton,
Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to post your comment. That is a very insightful post and you make some very valid arguments.
Joe
The studies linking aluminum with Alzheimers have never been replicated and new studies show no link at all. Your claim that aluminum has been *proven* to cause Alzheimers is out of date at best, and clearly dishonest at worst. You should get educated instead of fear mongering.
Eric,
Thanks for stopping by. You may be right. One thing I don’t think you can argue with is aluminum does cause health problems if consumed.
Joe
Hmm… looks like your skepticism was well-founded. Despite the fact they still may leach 0% of BPA, the betrayal and distrust caused by the CEO admitting this week that SIGG has KNOWN for years they contain BPA, yet chose never to acknowledge that, is disheartening.
Wow. Really disheartening. And flat out unethical.
Come on Joseph.. “aluminum causes healh problems if consumed”. Well so can a thousand other things like mold, rust, mercury, bleach, etc. What’s the point of saying that when it’s obvious?
There’s also your statement about “consuming aluminum has been proven to cause such health problems as Alzheimer’s and Lou Gehrig’s disease” Please give me your source. All studies only show the LINK or CORRELATION between aluminum and those diseases, it doesn’t state that it causes those diseases.
Prove me wrong and submit a study which makes this exact statement. I doubt you will find any.
On the other hand… recent news: SIGG has BPA in liner :)